NEW YORK (MainStreet) – Groupon has had incredible success in recent years, growing from a local coupon site for avid bargain hunters to a massive international operation with more than 40 million customers worldwide that is estimated to be worth billions. But despite this success, or perhaps because of it, the company continues to run up against criticism that it hurts many of the businesses it works with.
Groupon partners with small businesses, and occasionally some larger retailers, and promises these companies a certain minimum number of customers in order for a deal to be activated. Once that number is met, consumers who have signed up for the deal are charged up front, providing the businesses an immediate cash flow. For its part in the transaction, Groupon takes a 50% cut.
Ideally, this is supposed to give businesses new customers and extra cash up front, while providing consumers with an unbeatable deal and some nice revenue for Groupon. However, not every party always wins in this arrangement.
One recent study from Rice University’s Graduate School of Business found that of 150 business that had previously signed up for a Groupon deal campaign, 40% would never do it again. Moreover, a third of those businesses said they actually lost money by using Groupon, often due to the fact that there were more Groupon customers than expected and most simply purchased the heavily discounted products rather than buying anything else from the store.
According to the paper, cleverly titled To Groupon or Not to Groupon, these deal sites generally benefit businesses in one of two ways. First and foremost, they often serve as an excellent way to advertise a company, something which is particularly true of a site like Groupon, given its massive user base. Regardless of whether your company sells a single Groupon, by simply appearing on Groupon’s website and the daily e-mail sent out to customers, this promotion can create a significant amount of buzz around your brand.
Aside from this, partnering with Groupon also allows businesses to practice what the researchers refer to as price discrimination, meaning they can appeal to more cost-conscious consumers who might otherwise never set foot in their store by targeting them with lower prices on specific items.