NEW YORK (MainStreet) While one-third of the middle class say Social Security will be their primary source of income in retirement, in future years that number may increase significantly.
"If Congress reduces the benefits of offering and contributing to retirement savings, fewer people will save," said Brian Graff, CEO and Executive Director of the American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries (ASPPA). "The result is more of tomorrow's retirees will need to turn to the government for help and that will mean more federal spending."
- Two-Thirds of Gen Y Would Change Jobs for Better Retirement Benefits
- Retiring And No Debt Is the American Dream, Consumers Say
- Maximizing Social Security Benefits May Hinge on a Temporary Reverse Mortgage
- Public Policy Changes That Could Derail Your Retirement Plan
- Asian-American Women More Confident About Retirement
Between 2000 and 2009, employers contributed almost $3.5 trillion to public and private retirement plans, according to the Coalition to Protect Retirement. However, changes to current incentives could adversely affect employer-sponsored plans, contributions and the retirement security of millions of Americans.
"Raising new revenue should not come at the expense of retirement savings not now or in the future," said Graff.
A study by the Coalition to Protect Retirement shows widespread support for maintaining the current tax treatment of retirement savings vehicles, such as 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans and traditional IRAs. About 87% of all Americans and 95% of those who have a tax-deferred 401(k)-like retirement plan account believe retirement savings should be off limits to Congress and not a source of new revenue for the government.
"Given the vast numbers of baby boomers who reach retirement age every day, retirement savings incentives are needed more than ever," said Kenneth E. Bentsen, president of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA).
In fact, retirement is a fantasy for many.