Commercial Drone Use Hastens Privacy Debate

NEW YORK (MainStreet) — Amazon announced December 1, 2013 that package deliveries, via unmanned aerial drone, to homes and businesses, are in the future for Millenial shoppers. This would be a leap forward for the domestic use of drones. But, as is true in everything else in modern America, legal issues will closely follow - or maybe even precede this.

Issues such as government regulations, rights of way, liability - not to mention the omnipresent privacy concerns - must be addressed. Professor Gregory S. McNeal, a Pepperdine University law professor, discussed these issues during a teleforum hosted by the Federalist Society on December 4. The Federalist Society is an organization of libertarian and conservative lawyers headquartered in Washington D.C.

McNeal said that civil libertarians are in some cases hitting the panic button about privacy issues. The drone is a catalyst for existing angst about privacy. He noted privacy infringing activities can be conducted already by low flying aircraft, helicopters etc. But Amazon's Bezos shifted the debate to commercial applications.

Commercial applications are plentiful too. He said that a rancher can use a drone, directed by an iPad, to check fencelines. Oil pipeline inspections could be another application.

"The list goes on and on," said McNeal. "There are tons of companies in Silicon Valley that have already developed this technology. A company called Skycatch has developed autonomous pick-up and delivery."

McNeal also said that the BBC has a drone journalism unit. He predicted that the BBC will eventually attach drones to news vans for aerial views of news scenes. There is also a company that wants to use drones for police and fire applications. This would cut down on false alarms and false police calls.

"It is a start-up industry where the barriers to entry are really low," claims McNeal.

Regarding privacy issues, McNeal does not think it is a real concern for the public. He said that the privacy advocates often use exaggerated arguments about accidents involving drones or equating delivery drones with predators in Afghanistan.